Skip to main content

Auntie — the sky is falling!!

That's an 'em dash' in the title there if you were wondering about the joke...

So this past week Apple announced it's earnings report, and the worst thing in the world happened. They missed the predictions. Apple only made $8 billion in profit. They were supposed to make $10 billion.

I'll pause a moment to let that sink in.... one more moment... ok... So what does it mean when a company like Apple only makes an outrageous sum of money instead of a OMG FREAKING OUTRAGEOUS sum of money? It means that the pundits sit down at their iPads, at their kitchen tables, with their bluetooth wireless keyboards, and pound out paragraph after paragraph of snarky prose about how it's the beginning of the end for Apple, and that we all told you that it would never survive after Steve Jobs passed on.

I'll pause another moment to let the irony of that last run-on sentence sink in.... ready yet?.... ok.... So as much of an Apple fan boy that I am, let me begin by saying that, yes, Apple is not the same company it was when Steve Jobs was running it. Is it as good of a company? Probably not. Steve Jobs was an amazing individual who could motivate people to pull purple bunnies out of their butt and convince us that we were living in a post-rabbit era. Very few people alive can do what Steve Jobs did, and that's simply a fact that the world needs to accept.

But does that fact mean that Apple is doomed? Let's take a look at a couple other facts.... actually... I'm still kinda stuck on that first fact... APPLE MADE $8 BILLION!! I know people who are unemployed, many people I know are digging themselves out of credit card debt, my house is worth 50% of what it was valued at in 2007.... and Apple didn't make $10 billion... only $8 billion.

So let's put away the tranquilizers, and step back from the ledges. There are a lot of other companies out there that are in much, much worse trouble. Blackberry and Netflix are two that come to mind rather quickly. At some point we all have to come to terms with the fact that most people who want an iPhone 4, probably already have one. The market saturation of smartphones in general is incredible, and at some point it means that sales are going to stagnate a bit. But we don't need to worry for too long. The magical iPhone 5 will be in our hands in a couple months, along with a new post-PC 7 inch tablet, if you believe the rumor mills. Such is the endless cycle of technological innovation, a cycle that in less than 10 years brought us from clunky laptops, phones that couldn't browse the internet, and tablets that involved ink and paper... to an era of ultra-thin laptops and the extinction of removable media; smartphones that will not only browse the internet, but will tell you how many cups of rice you need to cook for your family dinner; and tablets that are so magical and life changing, that bloggers like myself will use them to deliver a simple message about a missed earnings report: "move along... nothing to see here."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The beat goes on

Yesterday Apple revealed their long awaited entry into the streaming music field. They were able to do this quickly because of the acquisition of Beats last year, and the systems and intellectual property that came with that purchase. Considering that the music reveal was pretty much the only big news out of a pretty benign developer keynote, I'll take a few moments to talk about what I think about it. Apple was perhaps the defining company in the music revolution of the past 20 years. With the introduction of the iPod that revolutionized portable music, to the creation of the iTunes store and the eventual death of DRM, Apple has been at the forefront of digital music. This leadership comes with high expectations to continue to lead, and so many people have long questioned Apple not getting into the streaming music business quicker. For the past few years new companies have come forth to lead the change in the streaming music evolution. From Pandora and its ability to create un

The NEW Microsoft

Today Microsoft held their Build conference keynote. As with Apple and Google, developer conference keynotes have become a mainstay of announcements for the general public beyond developers. At first it seemed that Microsoft would be bucking that trend today as the first portions of their keynote were very, very developer centric. However, a lot changed when they started talking about Windows 10. Microsoft is betting the future on building a platform that applications will build off of. Much like Apple and Google, they seem to be discovering that the real money isn't in the operating system itself, but in helping bring applications to consumers through validated app stores. In Microsoft's case it's also seeking to converge all of their platforms into a single unified platform. They once again reiterated today that Windows 10 will run on all of the devices that are out there, from phones to tablets to PC's to XBox game consoles. This means that applications can be writ

Welcome do double digits Mr. Windows

This past week was big for Microsoft and it's future with Windows. Windows 10 was given star status at a press reveal, showing off all of the new features that will be coming in this highly anticipated update to many of our desktops. I watched the live blog of the event, and have been reading over a lot of the reviews of the new technology that Microsoft is looking to deploy. My initial reaction is to be impressed. Much of what was wrong with Windows in the past seems to be a focal point for fixing in Windows 10. A few key things stood out to me as areas that I'm anxious to see more. First, I have to applaud Microsoft for being willing to step back from a design decision (Metro) that didn't pan out they way that they wanted it to. They took what they learned from that experience and have incorporated it into the regular desktop experience in a way that is much more seamless and useful. In fact, Microsoft is ahead of the curve in how they are presenting a user interface