Skip to main content

Twice the factors equals twice the fun

This entry might be pretty basic for a lot of my techie companions, but since we've been talking about security recently, I thought it might be good to do a quick introduction to 2-factor authentication for those that aren't as familiar with it. At it's most basic level, 2-factor authentication is about two things; something you know, and something you have. Most of us are used to working with passwords to authenticate ourselves to various resources. This is the something we know portion of 2-factor authentication.

The problem with something we know is that as soon as someone else knows it... it's not a secret anymore, and not very useful for security purposes. When we add in something we have to get 2 factors of authentication it's no longer just about what we know, but what we have. Then, it's not as terrible if someone knows what we know, because they don't have what we have, so knowing what they know doesn't help them as much, unless of course they end up having what we have, in which case we better hope that they also don't know what we know, because then they'll have what we have AND know what we know, causing people like myself rant in long run-on sentences about having and knowing things that people shouldn't have or know.

So the key with something we have is that we're often able to secure physical 'things' much better than we can secure knowledge. Securing knowledge is tough, because that knowledge needs to be shared with at least one other person... the system we want to access. So even though we might be quite good at keeping secrets, like our login passwords, the systems that we share those secrets with are often not as good as humans at keeping secrets. Usually they try hard, but too often they're the target of knowledge thieves who want nothing more than to force a system to reveal all of it's possible knowledge (ie. passwords) for their own personal gain.

However, things are a whole different story. Things are physical, and since the dawn of man, we've learned how to keep track of physical things really, really well. This is why many security experts tell people that it's OK to go ahead and write down their passwords on a little slip of paper in their wallets. We've learned how to keep track of our wallets since we were young, and we're quite aware of how to protect them physically.

So what are these things we have for accessing systems? In some cases, it could be a bio-metric system, like a fingerprint. Since our fingers are always attached to us (or so we hope), it's pretty easy to secure this 'thing'. If someone finds out your password to a system, but they also need your fingerprint to access it... well, they've just made their job close to impossible. However, fingerprints and retina scanners all require special hardware hooked up to our machines, so a much more common technique is a number generating device.

Many people know these devices by their brand name "SecureID", but the basic principle is the same. You are given a little token that has an LCD screen on it with sets of numbers that change every 60 seconds (smartphone apps that do the same thing are becoming common too). The master system is synchronized with your device, and it knows at all times what your number is. However, the system is never set up to tell anyone what a number is at any given time. It can just answer 'Yes' or 'No'. So a login situation looks like this:

  • A user types in their username and password in to a login system.
  • The login system asks them what their current number code is.
  • The login system then makes a request to a security system and asks "Is Mr X's generated number 12345?"
  • The security system then says either yes or no.
  • If the answer is 'no' then the login attempt is denied and the user has to try again.
So with 2-factor authentication, you are almost always guaranteed that your login is not going to be compromised. Even if someone knows your password they still need your physical 'thing'. If they somehow have your physical 'thing', they still need your password. It's not an impossible situation for a hacker to overcome, but it makes life difficult to the point of not even trying in many cases. There are many systems out there that practice 2-factor authentication, and if you've worked in any number of governmental agencies, or very large companies, it's likely that you've come across 2-factor authentication. But 2-factor is quickly becoming mainstream. A couple of years ago, online games started adding 2-factor authentication to their systems as a way to stop people from having their accounts hacked. Then, in the wake of the recent hacking news, Google's 2-factor authentication for GMail has been getting a lot of press, as a good way to make sure your primary e-mail account doesn't get compromised.

So the time was never better to start thinking more about 2-factor authentication. As more and more of our life goes online, it's important to take all the right steps to make sure that you're not the target of a hack. 2-factor authentication is a great tool in the average users toolbox to help keep you safe online.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The beat goes on

Yesterday Apple revealed their long awaited entry into the streaming music field. They were able to do this quickly because of the acquisition of Beats last year, and the systems and intellectual property that came with that purchase. Considering that the music reveal was pretty much the only big news out of a pretty benign developer keynote, I'll take a few moments to talk about what I think about it. Apple was perhaps the defining company in the music revolution of the past 20 years. With the introduction of the iPod that revolutionized portable music, to the creation of the iTunes store and the eventual death of DRM, Apple has been at the forefront of digital music. This leadership comes with high expectations to continue to lead, and so many people have long questioned Apple not getting into the streaming music business quicker. For the past few years new companies have come forth to lead the change in the streaming music evolution. From Pandora and its ability to create un

The NEW Microsoft

Today Microsoft held their Build conference keynote. As with Apple and Google, developer conference keynotes have become a mainstay of announcements for the general public beyond developers. At first it seemed that Microsoft would be bucking that trend today as the first portions of their keynote were very, very developer centric. However, a lot changed when they started talking about Windows 10. Microsoft is betting the future on building a platform that applications will build off of. Much like Apple and Google, they seem to be discovering that the real money isn't in the operating system itself, but in helping bring applications to consumers through validated app stores. In Microsoft's case it's also seeking to converge all of their platforms into a single unified platform. They once again reiterated today that Windows 10 will run on all of the devices that are out there, from phones to tablets to PC's to XBox game consoles. This means that applications can be writ

Welcome do double digits Mr. Windows

This past week was big for Microsoft and it's future with Windows. Windows 10 was given star status at a press reveal, showing off all of the new features that will be coming in this highly anticipated update to many of our desktops. I watched the live blog of the event, and have been reading over a lot of the reviews of the new technology that Microsoft is looking to deploy. My initial reaction is to be impressed. Much of what was wrong with Windows in the past seems to be a focal point for fixing in Windows 10. A few key things stood out to me as areas that I'm anxious to see more. First, I have to applaud Microsoft for being willing to step back from a design decision (Metro) that didn't pan out they way that they wanted it to. They took what they learned from that experience and have incorporated it into the regular desktop experience in a way that is much more seamless and useful. In fact, Microsoft is ahead of the curve in how they are presenting a user interface