Skip to main content

Trial and Errol?

So I've tried to avoid it for the past few weeks, but I think it's time to finally say something about the whole Apple vs. Samsung trial debacle. The trial has dominates the tech news cycle relentlessly for weeks, and it's become so much of a sideshow that it's almost embarrassing to our industry. Between the swashbuckling Errol Flynn antics of the lawyers that finally emboldened the judge to ask them if they were on crack, to the completely idiotic and clumsy Errol the owl (from Harry Potter) arguments and missteps, this trial has ranked right up there with the must-see TV drama of the OJ Simpson glove fiasco.

At the heart of the trial is the notion that Samsung, in it's desire to catch up to the skyrocketing Apple, decided to simply copy Apple's trademarked designs for it's own products, so that they would be more competitive at market. Combine this with the pre-4.0 Android habit of trying to constantly keep up with iOS, and you get the making of a trademark lawsuit that should really have solved itself years ago. By that I mean, duh, Samsung copied Apple and most people simply don't care.

Full disclosure here.... I own many Apple products and like them. When I purchased and used an Android phone I specifically got an HTC since Sense had a unique feel that made it different than iOS. But to even the most novice eye, what Samsung did was blatantly obvious. I remember a few years ago, a friend of mine handed me his Samsung Galaxy phone to look at. It was silver and rounded on the back, with a silver beveled edge... just like the iPhone 3. When I turned it on, it had four square icons at the bottom, just like iOS. Then the complete slap in the face when I swiped through the list of apps... Samsung had completely modified Android so that you swiped left/right between screens of apps, instead of up/down through a long list of apps (which is the Android default). At every turn, this phone screamed "I AM JUST LIKE AN IPHONE!!! LOVE ME!!!" Did I mistake my friends phone for an iPhone? Not really. It wasn't hard to miss the huge "Samsung" imprinted on the front of the screen, or the fact that it had four buttons on the front instead of just one. But was it a blatant case of "me too" copying? Most certainly. Should Apple have pursued Samsung on this? Sure, back in those days it was pretty open and shut.

But we're years removed from that now, and Samsung has thankfully started to rely more on Google's design guidance. The latest Android version (Jelly Bean) is a really cool operating system in it's own right, and Google is starting to differentiate itself from just an iOS copy. The latest Samsung devices are much more unique and don't feel like an Apple device much at all. But yet, Apple decided to push ahead and ask for import injunction, and a massive showboat trial. It stinks of Steve Job's prideful statement that he was going to go "thermo-nuclear" on Android. It stinks of sour grapes. That's not the way I wanted to think about Apple, since on many levels I think their product is still vastly superior to Android on many levels.

So as the trial winds down to a close, I wait for a nice simple resolution. But I doubt I'm going to get one. I'm sure there will be appeals, and new trials, and more silliness. For now I'm going to go back to trying to ignore the whole thing, and hope it all goes away. Maybe they'll be some nice tech news about games or something light-hearted next week... one can hope.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The beat goes on

Yesterday Apple revealed their long awaited entry into the streaming music field. They were able to do this quickly because of the acquisition of Beats last year, and the systems and intellectual property that came with that purchase. Considering that the music reveal was pretty much the only big news out of a pretty benign developer keynote, I'll take a few moments to talk about what I think about it. Apple was perhaps the defining company in the music revolution of the past 20 years. With the introduction of the iPod that revolutionized portable music, to the creation of the iTunes store and the eventual death of DRM, Apple has been at the forefront of digital music. This leadership comes with high expectations to continue to lead, and so many people have long questioned Apple not getting into the streaming music business quicker. For the past few years new companies have come forth to lead the change in the streaming music evolution. From Pandora and its ability to create un

Microsoft Surface Pro 3

So I've been a horrible blog author and have neglected this site for far to long. It's not that I haven't had anything to say, I've just neglected to say it. So with an attempt to get back on the wagon, here's some thoughts on Microsoft's announcement yesterday for it's Surface Pro 3. Despite being a minor Apple fanboy, the most interesting company to watch, in the personal computing space right now, is Microsoft. With the departure of Steve Ballmer, and the rise of Satya Nadella, it has been an interesting 9 months for one of the founding pioneers of personal technology. Many agree that Windows 8 has not lived up to what Microsoft would like it to be. They made a bold attempt to redefine how users interact with their computers, and merge the tablet and desktop experience. However, that experiment, by most accounts, has failed. This is a common pattern for Microsoft however, alternating between a mediocre OS release, and then a stellar one. Therefore, it&#

Under the Surface of Microsoft

One of the big tech announcements recently, that caught the world by surprise, was the new Microsoft Surface tablet. Although many people expected some sort of tablet annoucement, I don't think anyone thought that Microsoft would pull out a full-on iPad competitor, complete with massive innovations in design and functionality. My first impression of Surface is that it's a really great piece of technology, and things like the built-in kickstand, and the smart-cover-like touch keyboard are really inventive. Since I'm writing this on an iPad with a wireless keyboard, I know there are plenty of times when the marriage of an old-school physical keyboard input method with modern touch screen interfaces results in something even better :) The thing I wanted to comment on though wasn't the introduction of new hardware, because I think that story is still evolving, and Microsoft's involvement with it's OEM's could be quite the fireworks show. What I want to ramble