Skip to main content

Oh Instant Messaging, I hardly knew you

For many years, I've been a big fan of Instant Messaging as a way to communicate with friends, especially those in other parts of the country. Sure e-mail works, but if you want to have a conversation with someone immediately, with a lot of back and forth, IM was the way to go. I jumped on the IM bandwagon all the way back in the ICQ days (and no, I don't remember my number). Followed by a bunch of years maintaining multiple protocols at the 'Big 3' at the time; AOL Instant Messaging (AIM), MSN Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. Many of us recall the years of running three different clients on our desktop at all times, because all of our friends used different systems. Thankfully, it wasn't too long before multi-protocol clients came into play and we could start to consolidate.

Google was a late comer to the market, but it's GTalk Instant Messenger caught on fast. It was slim and trim and since GMail was the rage, everyone had a log-in. Slowly, over the course of 5 years or so, GTalk became my single IM platform. Most of my friends had migrated to it, and, anyway, I had grown distant from the couple of hold-outs who hadn't made the switch. This was the state of thing for a long time. Until recently.

In the past couple of years, the IM has undergone a huge shift, along with the rest of the tech industry, because of the advent of mobile computing. Before smartphones, people would use SMS for short conversations with friends, but unless you had one of those cool full-keyboard phones, it wasn't an ideal solution. Then along come phones with full on-screen keyboards, and most importantly tablets. All of a sudden it seems that SMS style messaging is the way to go, and if you're not on board you've missed the boat.

We now have a completely new playing field of contestants in the messaging arena, and all of them have a decidedly mobile bent.

  • Apple's iMessage was an early mover in this area, and seamlessly merged your SMS and iMessage experience on their iPhone product. It's only been very recently that iMessage has made it's way to OS X. However, it's strictly an Apple eco-system product.
  • Facebook entered the arena with it's Facebook Messenger, completely dismantling their old e-mail style messaging application in favor of something that looks and feels like SMS on a phone. Facebook Messenger on a smartphone is all over the place. To use Facebook Messenger on your computer, you need to use their website built-in application (or try and get one of the multi-clients to work, which has been hit/miss at times)
  • Then there's the newcomer, WhatsApp with it's direct SMS replacement app for phones. It doesn't even attempt to offer a desktop client experience. 
  • Microsoft has announced that it's killing it's old MSN Messenger, ever since it acquired Skype. Microsoft is taking a very different route in the messaging wars, by using a full featured video conferencing service, and extending it down to the messaging level. Whereas, other services are starting at messages and moving up to video.
  • BlackBerry Messaging has also escaped the confines of it's single platform and it now available for other phones as an SMS type replacement.
  • Finally, my beloved GTalk is getting shoved aside to make room for Google+ Hangouts. Google realized that they had too many messaging products, so they merged them all into one. However, they decided to forgo their earlier adoption of standard messaging protocols, and go with a proprietary standard. This means that most of the multi-clients will stop working at some point in the future. They also have moved away from providing desktop clients, outside of their Chrome Browser experience, instead focusing on apps for phones and tablets.
There is one place however, where Instant Messaging seems to still be going strong is inside a corporate environment. Many corporations still use Instant Messaging as a way to quickly communicate with co-workers. However, it's apparent that even in this environment, the mobile is still rearing it's head. Many of the enterprise level systems for doing corporate IM now have mobile apps for your phone or tablet, so you can stay connected wherever you are. 

I'll be honest, I'm not sure how I feel about the change to Instant Messaging. With the loss of so many desktop based clients, it's changed the experience. Before, you would have a list of friends who were "online" at the time, and you could start up a conversation with them. Now, because everyone is connected all the time, you never know if that person is truly available or not. Some of the services try to provide some sense of "presence", showing you an icon if the service thinks the person is around, but they're not as robust and accurate as the old services. As with everything, it seems that progress marches on, and things change. However, I'd like to take a moment of silence to remember the way things used to be, with AIM, MSN and YIM all humming away in the background of my desktop. Oh wait... these things were constantly beeping at you, telling you who was logging on, logging off, and who can forget the distinct sounds AIM made when you got a new message. Oh well, silence is overrated. I'm going to go G+ Hangout my friends.... or maybe Skype them... though FB Messenger might be good too.... wonder how many are on iMessage.....


Popular posts from this blog

The beat goes on

Yesterday Apple revealed their long awaited entry into the streaming music field. They were able to do this quickly because of the acquisition of Beats last year, and the systems and intellectual property that came with that purchase. Considering that the music reveal was pretty much the only big news out of a pretty benign developer keynote, I'll take a few moments to talk about what I think about it. Apple was perhaps the defining company in the music revolution of the past 20 years. With the introduction of the iPod that revolutionized portable music, to the creation of the iTunes store and the eventual death of DRM, Apple has been at the forefront of digital music. This leadership comes with high expectations to continue to lead, and so many people have long questioned Apple not getting into the streaming music business quicker. For the past few years new companies have come forth to lead the change in the streaming music evolution. From Pandora and its ability to create un

The NEW Microsoft

Today Microsoft held their Build conference keynote. As with Apple and Google, developer conference keynotes have become a mainstay of announcements for the general public beyond developers. At first it seemed that Microsoft would be bucking that trend today as the first portions of their keynote were very, very developer centric. However, a lot changed when they started talking about Windows 10. Microsoft is betting the future on building a platform that applications will build off of. Much like Apple and Google, they seem to be discovering that the real money isn't in the operating system itself, but in helping bring applications to consumers through validated app stores. In Microsoft's case it's also seeking to converge all of their platforms into a single unified platform. They once again reiterated today that Windows 10 will run on all of the devices that are out there, from phones to tablets to PC's to XBox game consoles. This means that applications can be writ

Welcome do double digits Mr. Windows

This past week was big for Microsoft and it's future with Windows. Windows 10 was given star status at a press reveal, showing off all of the new features that will be coming in this highly anticipated update to many of our desktops. I watched the live blog of the event, and have been reading over a lot of the reviews of the new technology that Microsoft is looking to deploy. My initial reaction is to be impressed. Much of what was wrong with Windows in the past seems to be a focal point for fixing in Windows 10. A few key things stood out to me as areas that I'm anxious to see more. First, I have to applaud Microsoft for being willing to step back from a design decision (Metro) that didn't pan out they way that they wanted it to. They took what they learned from that experience and have incorporated it into the regular desktop experience in a way that is much more seamless and useful. In fact, Microsoft is ahead of the curve in how they are presenting a user interface