Skip to main content

By hook or by Nook

One of the big tech stories this past week that caught my eye, was the announcement that Barnes & Noble's Nook platform may not be long for this world. At least not in it's current shape. Apparently, the hardware hasn't been performing as well, financially, as needed, and so the latest word is that Microsoft is trying to buy the Nook experience and allow B&N to exit the hardware market.

As a Nook user, I find this very sad. I've own one of the original Nooks, that had the little mini-touchscreens below the main e-Ink screen, and it's been a great device for the years I've owned it. When I got my iPad I specifically continued buying books in Nook format because I wanted to continue to support a bookstore that I really like going to. However, it looks like all of that might be coming to an end.

From Microsoft's perspective the deal is a big win for them, if it goes through. They get a huge headstart on their eBook ecosystem for their continuing mobile plans. Similar to Apple's iBook store, Google's Play bookstore, and Amazon's Kindle bookstore, Microsoft would gain an instant audience for its new eBook experience. Allowing them to boost their standing against the other players in the mobile market.

However, the bigger question that is raised by all of this is, what is the real role of eBooks now-a-days. Similar to digitally delivered music and movies, eBooks have followed the traditional path of being locked down with DRM and limited to a single store. If you buy a Nook book, you can only read it using Nook software. If you buy a Kindle book, likewise, it's only able to be read with Kindle software. Some vendors, like Nook, have even gone so far as to remove you ability to read a book if your credit card expires in their store. This really means that you don't truly own the book you're reading. You're just given a license to read it in perpetuity, as long as you continue to be a customer of their store. It's like a book-specific library card. 

This model only lasted so long in the music side of the world before it was dismantled. But not before it gave a chance for companies like Apple to build a customer base for it's iTunes store with its iPod devices. Now that we have a diverse setup of devices that can read eBooks, it's probably about time to look at changing this model. Amazon, Google, Apple and Microsoft/B&N all have an ecosystem that has been built up for years. They have well established customer bases, and can start to look at loosening up their DRM practices, yet retain customers to their individual stores. But it's going to take customers, and companies like Apple and Google to push publishers to make this change.

A couple of publishers are starting to experiment with DRM-free books, such as TOR and J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter books (h/t Wes). One can hope that in the future more publishers will take a more forward thinking approach and open up their material, and it looks like Microsoft will be playing a bigger role in that discussion going forward.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The beat goes on

Yesterday Apple revealed their long awaited entry into the streaming music field. They were able to do this quickly because of the acquisition of Beats last year, and the systems and intellectual property that came with that purchase. Considering that the music reveal was pretty much the only big news out of a pretty benign developer keynote, I'll take a few moments to talk about what I think about it. Apple was perhaps the defining company in the music revolution of the past 20 years. With the introduction of the iPod that revolutionized portable music, to the creation of the iTunes store and the eventual death of DRM, Apple has been at the forefront of digital music. This leadership comes with high expectations to continue to lead, and so many people have long questioned Apple not getting into the streaming music business quicker. For the past few years new companies have come forth to lead the change in the streaming music evolution. From Pandora and its ability to create un

The NEW Microsoft

Today Microsoft held their Build conference keynote. As with Apple and Google, developer conference keynotes have become a mainstay of announcements for the general public beyond developers. At first it seemed that Microsoft would be bucking that trend today as the first portions of their keynote were very, very developer centric. However, a lot changed when they started talking about Windows 10. Microsoft is betting the future on building a platform that applications will build off of. Much like Apple and Google, they seem to be discovering that the real money isn't in the operating system itself, but in helping bring applications to consumers through validated app stores. In Microsoft's case it's also seeking to converge all of their platforms into a single unified platform. They once again reiterated today that Windows 10 will run on all of the devices that are out there, from phones to tablets to PC's to XBox game consoles. This means that applications can be writ

Welcome do double digits Mr. Windows

This past week was big for Microsoft and it's future with Windows. Windows 10 was given star status at a press reveal, showing off all of the new features that will be coming in this highly anticipated update to many of our desktops. I watched the live blog of the event, and have been reading over a lot of the reviews of the new technology that Microsoft is looking to deploy. My initial reaction is to be impressed. Much of what was wrong with Windows in the past seems to be a focal point for fixing in Windows 10. A few key things stood out to me as areas that I'm anxious to see more. First, I have to applaud Microsoft for being willing to step back from a design decision (Metro) that didn't pan out they way that they wanted it to. They took what they learned from that experience and have incorporated it into the regular desktop experience in a way that is much more seamless and useful. In fact, Microsoft is ahead of the curve in how they are presenting a user interface